摘要:目的 比较性研究3种腹腔镜全子宫切除术:完全腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)和两种腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)的特点。方法 回顾性分析了2002年9月~2005年9月间在我院行腹腔镜全子宫切除术393例患者的临床资料,其中TLH 178例,LAVHa177例,LAVHb38例。结果 各组均以子宫肌瘤、子宫腺肌症为最常见病因,在TLH组、LAVHa组和LAVHb组分别占66.9%、38.4%和52.6%。TLH组在平均手术时间和出血量上与LAVHa组相比差异无显著性(P>0.05),但较LAVHb组少(P<0.05);TLH组切除子宫的体积显著大于其他两组(P<0.05)。手术并发症发生率在TLH组为9.0%,低于LAVHa组(14.1%)和LAVHb组(18.4%),但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 TLH组切除的子宫体积较大,不影响出血量和手术时间,且并发症较少。
Abstract
ABSTRACT:Objective To compare the clinical characteristics of three subcategories of laparoscopic hysterectomy: total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and two subcategories of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH): LAVHs and LAVHb. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 393 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, including TLH (n=178), LAVHa (n=177), and LAVHb (n=38),in our hospital from September 2002 to September 2005. Results Myoma and adenomyosis of uterus were the most common diseases in this study, accounting for 66.9%, 38.4%, and 52.6% in TLH group, LAVHa group, and LAVHb group, respectively. The mean surgery duration and blood loss were not significantly different between TLH group and LAVHa group (P>0.05), but were significantly less in TLH group than in LAVHb group (P<0.05). The bulk of uterus in TLH group was significantly bigger than in other two groups (P<0.05). The incidence of major complications in the TLH group (9.0%) was lower than in LAVHa group (14.1%) and in LAVHb group (18.4%), but without statistical significance. Conclusion Compared with LAVH, TLH is feasible to deal with bigger uterus with less blood loss and shorter surgery duration and without more frequent complications.
关键词
完全腹腔镜全子宫切除术 /
腹腔镜辅助阴式全子宫切除术 /
比较性研究
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
total laparoscopic dysterectomy /
laparoscopic-assisted vacinal dysterectomy
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Reich H, Decaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. J Gynecol Surg, 1989, 5(4): 213-216.
[2]Munro MG, Parker WH. A classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 82(4 Pt 1):624-629.
[3]Garry R, Reich H, Liu CY. Laparoscopic hysterectomy definitions and indications[J]. Gynecol Endosc, 1994, 3:1-3.
[4]Wattiez A, Soriano D, Fiaccavento A, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very enlarged uteri[J]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, 2002, 9(2):125-130.
[5]Cook JR, OShea RT, Seman EI. Laparovaginal hysterectomy: a decade of evolution[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 44(2):111-116.
[6]Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, et al. Radomized comparison of laporoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1992, 80(6):895-901.
[7]Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Bess O, et al. Injuries associated with the use of a linear stapler during operative laparoscopy: review of diagnosis, management and prevention[J]. J Gynecol Surg, 1993, 9(3):145-150.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}